Skip to content

Ian O’Shaughnessy

Quotes · T.R. Fehrenbach

“As a construct, history is too often revised to match contemporary views. It has been said that each generation must rewrite history in order to understand it. The opposite is true. Moderns revise history to make it palatable, not to understand it. Those who edit ‘history’ to popular taste each decade will never understand the past—neither the horrors nor glories of which the human race is equally capable—and for that reason, they will fail to understand themselves.”

– T.R. Fehrenbach, Lone Star: A History of Texas and the Texans, Da Capo Press, 2000, pg. xiii.

From volume VIII of the file · Book · 20th century

Themes: history

More from T.R. Fehrenbach

“A barbarian awareness of true danger can be an asset to any society, as well as a barbarian willingness to believe that straight action, not interminable moral confusion, is sometimes required.”

– T.R. Fehrenbach, Lone Star: A History of Texas and the Texans, Da Capo Press, 2000, pg. 653.

“Bowie, born somewhere in the South in the 1790’s, was raised in a family that became wealthy in Louisiana early in the century. He roamed, running slaves with Jean Lafitte in contravention to what every Southerner felt was a stupid law, exploring Texas, fighting Indians. Bowie was remarkable in two respects. He fitted in easily with the best society of the Creole towns and vast plantations, and he had the enormous respect of the wildest and toughest men on the harshest of all American frontiers. He was a killer: he killed the son of Jean Lafitte, who crossed him, crippled ‘Bloody’ Sturdivant, gutted Major Norris Wright and a verified number of others, in the most desperate ‘medleys’ or duels. He made the great knife his brother Rezin forged for him a glittering legend; soon Bowie knives were manufactured in England for sale on the American frontier. Yet Bowie was simply not a killer in the modern, civilized sense. He lived in a violent society, and men of keen judgement and good breeding considered him quite sound. The respect tendered him far exceeded that of any duelist.”

– T.R. Fehrenbach, Lone Star: A History of Texas and the Texans, Da Capo Press, 2000, pg. 209.

“Codes tend to live on in debased form, often long after the necessity that called them forth is dead.”

– T.R. Fehrenbach, Lone Star: A History of Texas and the Texans, Da Capo Press, 2000, pg. 712.

“Every age has a people or a culture that believes the shortest distance between dreams and goals is a bomb, a bullet, a gas oven, or a keen Toledo sword and burning stake.”

– T.R. Fehrenbach, Lone Star: A History of Texas and the Texans, Da Capo Press, 2000, pg. 21.

“Historically, the better organized and more powerful always became dominant, whatever their philosophy.”

– T.R. Fehrenbach, Lone Star: A History of Texas and the Texans, Da Capo Press, 2000, pg. 615.

“In all times and in all places there were only three ways by which greatly differentiated peoples had lived together: as slave or serf and master; by miscegenation; or by some system of caste. The first and the last solutions, historically, were commonest; they had been employed from the New World to India. The Spanish, in America, had imposed a combination of the two, with considerable miscegenation on the side.”

– T.R. Fehrenbach, Lone Star: A History of Texas and the Texans, Da Capo Press, 2000, pg. 399.

“It is a valid question, whether the long frontier shaped Anglo-America, or whether attitudes, prejudices, and ethics brought from Europe shaped the American frontier.”

– T.R. Fehrenbach, Lone Star: A History of Texas and the Texans, Da Capo Press, 2000, pg. 85.

“Texas was never a refuge for the lowly, or oppressed, or a beacon proclaiming human rights. It was a primordial land with a Pleistocene climate, inhabited by species inherently hostile to the Anglo-Celtic breed. Some North Americans chose to conquer it, and in the process unquestionably came to look upon themselves as a sort of chosen race.

This sense of being a chosen people, which was tribal and biblical, was an enormous Texan strength rather than a weakness. It gave Anglo-Texans immediate moral superiority, in action, over their enemies. It led to high nobility and at times a valor almost beyond belief. It also produced brutal prejudice, and ethnic self-satisfaction that amounted to chauvinism. The whole feeling was guileless, and therefore guiltless. Hypocrisy toward warfare was never part of the Texan ethos. The generations that moved across the Sabine were already bred to certain hatreds and war.”

– T.R. Fehrenbach, Lone Star: A History of Texas and the Texans, Da Capo Press, 2000, pg. 447.